Mainstreaming was defined as making risk-management principles and ‘thinking OSH’ an intrinsic part of the way decisions are made and actions are taken at the workplace, so that OSH is not just an ‘add-on’. It is easier to achieve this if workers and employers already come to the workplace well qualified and with an enhanced understanding of OSH — and with a developed ‘risk-prevention’ culture.
Future engineers, architects, medical professionals and business administrators
and managers will all need to take account of OSH in aspects in their working lives.
This report presents a variety of cases concerning how OSH has been included
in university-level education. Of most interest were examples where OSH was
embedded in the programme of other undergraduate studies, such as a general
engineering undergraduate course or a business studies course. However, few
examples were found where OSH/risk education had been truly embedded within
the curriculum of individual courses.
Future engineers, architects, medical professionals and business administrators and managers will all need to take account of occupational safety and health (OSH) aspects in their working lives. This report and the cases in it demonstrate that there are more challenges to integrating OSH into university-level education compared with other levels of education. However, the cases also show that steps are being taken to mainstream OSH into university education in a variety of disciplines and in a variety of ways.
To underpin occupational safety and health (OSH) education in schools and colleges it is necessary to formalise it in curriculum requirements. This report reviews how the Member States are including OSH and risk education in their national curricula. The report shows that there is considerable progress and activity in this respect at both primary and secondary education levels in terms of both implemented and planned actions in the Member States. The report also identifies some success factors for mainstreaming OSH into education curricula.