Interview with Jukka Takala
News release - 05.10.2006
Jukka Takala succeeded Hans-Horst Konkolewsky as director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work at the end of September. Dr Takala, who has worked in the safety and health field for almost three decades, joined the Agency from the International Labour Organisation where he was director of the Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment (SafeWork). ‘I’m really pleased to be living in Bilbao. It will be a big change after living for more than 20 years in Geneva but my first impressions are really positive,’ says Dr Takala. ‘As well as the
Jukka Takala succeeded Hans-Horst Konkolewsky as director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work at the end of September. Dr Takala, who has worked in the safety and health field for almost three decades, joined the Agency from the International Labour Organisation where he was director of the Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment (SafeWork).
‘I’m really pleased to be living in Bilbao. It will be a big change after living for more than 20 years in Geneva but my first impressions are really positive,’ says Dr Takala. ‘As well as the professional challenge of the work, I will have to learn about the culture, food and wine of the region. I’m a curious person so I want to learn new things, and also a new language. My Spanish is very, very limited at the moment.’
Dr Takala also
hopes to learn some Basque: ‘As a Finnish speaker, the pronunciation of
Basque does not sound too difficult. The language interests me.’
Annually,
more than 150,000 fatalities in the European Union are caused by
work-related accidents and diseases. What can the European Agency for
Safety and Health at Work do to reduce this terrible toll?
‘The
vast majority of work-related fatalities and illnesses are preventable.
If you look at the best and worst countries or best and worst companies
in various sectors, there’s a big difference in the number of deaths at
work. That’s clear evidence that most of those fatalities could be
prevented.
‘A key role of the Agency is to raise awareness of workplace risks and, just as importantly, disseminate information on to how to prevent them. Europe’s occupational safety and health challenges are too complex to be tackled by a single organisation, or even a single country. The Agency is able to bring together the best information, insights and thinking in the field from Europe and other parts of the world.’
What are your immediate priorities as you start work at the Agency?
‘We
have to build and maintain a preventive safety and health culture that
permeates all society. Such a culture must be based on the right to a
safe and healthy work environment, on the principle of prevention, and
on a systems approach. Safety and health prevention is not a one-off
project — it is continuous, systematic work. We also have to enhance EU
and Member State safety and health programmes.’
What do you consider are the Agency’s main strength and weakness?
‘Our
strong point is that we are free to talk and work with practically
anybody, whether it’s governments, employers or workers. Our weakness
is that there are many players in this field. We deal with 27 Member
States, the European Commission and the European Parliament, thousands
of companies and million of workers. To get our message across,
especially to the smaller companies, is a big challenge.’
What
are the most important lessons about workplace safety and health you
learned from your time at the International Labour Organisation’s
SafeWork programme?
‘None needs to reinvent the wheel. There
are an awful lot of ideas, experiences and examples of good practice
around the world that we can learn from. We don’t have to learn
everything the hard way or experience all the fatalities ourselves
before we can start building a safety and health culture. Another issue
is that involving the social partners in a tripartite set-up is vital.
It may take more time to involve workers, employers and their
organisations but it is a guarantee for success.’
Why are you interested in safety and health at work, and why does it matter?
‘Safety
and health is one of the major problems in our workplaces, but it’s an
area in which we can make a big difference. It’s a moral and ethical
issue, but it’s also about company productivity and competitiveness.
And, poor safety and health conditions at work contribute to
unemployment, sickness absence, long-term disabilities and early
retirement.’
Despite the continued decline in the numbers
of agricultural workers, farming continues to have more than its fair
share of accidents. What is the problem with European agriculture?
‘Agriculture
is a high-risk sector with exposure to a wide range of hazards.
Moreover, the enterprises are mainly small, often found in some of the
most distant areas of Europe, and typically have a diverse workforce
that includes the very young, very old, migrant, and seasonal workers.
Often the protection measures are poor or do not exist at all. It’s
hard for us to reach them, but we have to find new ways of getting our
message across.’
How safe is the Spanish workplace?
‘Spain
has a fairly high level of workplace accidents and diseases, but one of
the reasons for this is that it has a very comprehensive reporting
system. Another point is that agriculture, which is a high-risk sector,
is very important in Spain. There’s also a lot of construction, another
high-risk occupation, because Spain is a rapidly developing economy.
You can’t compare Spain, say, with the UK, which is pretty much a
service economy. Better measures are needed for both while not
necessarily similar.’
How can the Agency improve safety in the construction sector?
‘We’ve
had a number of different campaigns in construction but we still need
to put a lot of effort into the sector. You certainly need rules and
regulations, but you also need to offer models of good practice and
information to the poorer performing Member States and employers. We
need to build a health and safety culture in construction. That itself
is a much more demanding task due to constantly changing conditions, a
large number of contractors and a mobile workforce.
‘We are also looking at how risks may be “designed out” by architects and planners so there are fewer hazards facing the workers once work on site begins.’
How successful was the Agency’s 2005 Europe-wide campaign on work-related noise?
‘Looking
from the outside, I think it got a clear message across in all of the
27 Member States. It was a simultaneous effort from governments,
industry and workers’ organisations, and that made the message much
stronger.’
Migrant workers are often employed in the riskier sectors. How can you improve their health and safety?
‘Clearly,
there’s migration from poorer to richer countries and, once there,
migrants tend to stay poorer. But there is an economic incentive for
migration and we should not deny that this is the case. You cannot
simply stop migration.
‘Having said that, migrant workers are
often over-represented in the so-called “3D jobs” - dirty, dangerous
and demanding - and in high-risk sectors such as agriculture,
construction, healthcare and transport. Their work is often
characterised by uncertainty, poor working conditions and low wages.
This is a major problem all over Europe.’
The promotion of workforce mobility is an EU strategic objective. How does the Agency support this objective?
‘It’s
another challenge for us. We have to reach people who may not be using
their mother tongue in their new country or who do not understand
safety warning symbols. If we could build a Europe-wide culture of
safety and health that would help to look after mobile workers.’
Up
to 56,000 deaths in the EU can be attributed to hazardous substances at
work such as asbestos. What can the Agency do to reduce this figure?
‘This
is a key issue for us. We are getting a good picture of accidents from
across Europe, but we do not get proper data about the impact of
dangerous substances. We have to improve this information. This is one
of the key fact-finding efforts to be followed by the Agency’s Risk
Observatory.
‘The elimination of exposure is the answer for any dangerous substance, whether it is asbestos, passive smoking at work or carbon monoxide from traffic. Legislation dealing with asbestos was passed in the 1970s, and since 2005 there has been a general ban on the production and marketing of asbestos. An EU-wide campaign is currently focussing on the demolition, maintenance, removal and disposal of asbestos-containing products. This “management” of the existing asbestos in place will be a long-lasting task’
How can companies be persuaded that money spent on safety and health is an investment, and not just another cost to be avoided?
‘Of
course, companies should protect their workers for legal and ethical
reasons. However, demonstrating a business case can help them go beyond
basic legal requirements. Bigger companies have already identified
safety and health as a key business issue - those Member States that
have the best conditions of work also have the highest productivity.
The challenge for us is to get the smaller companies to adopt the same
measures. We have to convince them that in the long run competitiveness
depends on a motivated, healthy workforce.’
The Agency has
set up a Risk Observatory to anticipate ‘new and emerging risks’. What
are the risks that most need its attention?
‘The main principle
of the Agency is to put prevention first. Evidence from one place can
become a method of prevention in another, and that’s why we have a Risk
Observatory.
‘But the observatory doesn’t only look at known problems such as accidents and dangerous substances, it also identifies potential problems such as avian flu or emerging technologies such as nanoscience. The latter could be beneficial for society and industry but, since its development outpaces our understanding of the implications for occupational safety and health, it may pose new hazards to workers.’
How can the Agency keep an ageing workforce safe and healthy?
‘We
have to look at the whole lifetime of the working population and ways
to keep people working healthily until retirement age. In my own
country, Finland, the average real retirement age is 59, rather than
the legal age of 65 - that’s pretty much the case in every European
country. It’s the result of a combination of accidents, diseases,
musculoskeletal disorders and stress-related problems at work.’
Eighteen
to 24-year-olds are at least 50% more likely to have a non-fatal
accident in the workplace than older workers. What is the Agency’s Safe
Start campaign for young people in 2006 is doing to help?
‘We
all share responsibility for protecting young people at work. Employers
are legally responsible for the health and safety of their workers. But
young people themselves have responsibilities as well as rights, and
there’s more they can be doing to make sure that they and their
colleagues stay safe. But this is also an issue for parents, for health
and safety professionals like us and for the education community.’
What plans do you have for the European Week for Safety and Health at Work in October 2006?
‘The
high point of the Safe Start campaign is the European Week for Safety
and Health at Work from 23 to 27 October, which is an annual series of
events on a health and safety theme. We’re encouraging schools and
colleges - as well as businesses and other organisations - to get
involved.’
Musculoskeletal disorders are a major work-related problem. What is the Agency doing to tackle this issue?
‘Our campaign in 2007 will be closely linked to the issues of productivity and competitiveness. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the biggest cause of absence from work in practically all of the Member States. These disorders strongly reduce the employability of those affected. But tackling MSDs is also morally and ethically important.’
