Why risk assessment?
This all comes at a huge cost:
- Human cost for workers and their families (real people behind each statistic)
- Business costs for organisations/ companies (sick leave, insurance costs, productivity, turnover, motivation, competitiveness etc.)
- Cost for society (increasing burden on healthcare systems)
Risk assessment is one of the main pillars of the framework and other directives on occupational safety and health (OSH). Investing in awareness raising and communication of resources, information and good practice is of clear value.
A prevention approach based on risk assessment is the cornerstone of the European approach to OSH. This is for good reasons. If the risk assessment process - the start of the risk management approach - is not done well or not done at all, the appropriate preventive measures are unlikely to be in place.
Too often, organisations do not adequately assess the risks in their workplaces. It can be a challenge for some, especially for micro-firms and SMEs, but this need not be so.
Risk assessment is part of a good management approach; EU legislation, including amongst others the Framework Directive, is in place along with some guidance, information and good practice resources.
What is needed is an integrated risk assessment approach that takes into account the different steps of risk assessment, the different needs of individual employers, and the changing world of work.
The Agency will focus on communicating the general principles of integrated risk assessment, its importance for effective prevention, and that risk assessment is both necessary and feasible.
A first step towards systematic OSH management.
For more information please check:
- Factsheet 80: “Risk Assessment – the key to Healthy Workplaces”
- Factsheet 81: “Risk Assessment – roles and responsibilities”
- Dedicated web section on Risk Assessment
Why is it an EU issue?
The need for improvement in risk assessment was identified in the Communication from the Commission on the practical implementation of the provisions of the Framework Directive, and its five first individual directives (COM (2004) 62 final).
The review found that:
- There is general lack of awareness of what is required and how to carry out a risk assessment
- The tasks of risk assessment, documentation and supervision is not universally spread
- Risk assessment is often considered a ‘one-off’ action and is not sustained
- Risks are not analysed and evaluated collectively; as a result, separate measures are being set in place, but there is no integrative approach for the analysis of the conditions at the workplace
- In the course of conducting superficial risk assessments the focus is put on identifying ‘obvious and immediate risks’; long-term effects such as those caused by chemicals are being neglected
- Psychosocial risks and work organisation factors are rarely considered in risk assessment
- The efficiency of the measures taken is not sufficiently supervised by employers
Since the risk assessment approach was first introduced into the EU directives, there is clear agreement that it should be part of an integrated management approach which the campaign will promote.


